By: Salma Benkabbou, Esq.

The Millennial Business Lawyer®

social media
trademark infringement

What happens when an influencer promotes a brand that violates a registered trademark?

In the following example (currently pending a resolution), we will illustrate the liability exposure for influencers related to their advertising practices in paid promotions of companies who may be held liable for trademark infringement.  


Petunia Products, Inc. (“Petunia”), an international cosmetics company, owns the BROW BOOST® trademark, which it uses in connection with its “Billion Dollar Brows” eyebrow primer and conditioner product.  

In July of 2020, Rodan & Fields, LLC (“R+F”), a cosmetics company in competition with Petunia, began to sell a product called “Brow Defining Boost.” This did not fare well with Petunia.  

Dispute against R+F:

Petunia filed a complaint which alleges that the R+F’s “Brow Defining Boost” product, which performs a similar function as Petunia’s brow product, improperly utilizes their Trademark, “Brow Boost”, on product packaging and in their advertising practices. 

Here are the 2 ways a social media influencer can find themselves liable for damages in their advertising practices:

1. SEO Ad Words

Petunia alleged that R+F used Google’s AdWords service to bid on search terms that use the Trademark, Brow Boost. As a result, customers who search for “Brow Boost” on Google are directed to hyperlinks for R+F’s product.

2. Social Media Hashtags

Petunia alleged that R+F’s Independent Consultants improperly and deceptively promoted their brow product by using the hashtag “#BROWBOOST,” which also causes dilution of Petunia’s social media presence.

Dispute against beauty blogger and social media influencer:

Petunia also named model and beauty influencer, Molly Sims (“Sims”), as a co-defendant in the lawsuit.  Petunia accuses Sims of: (1) direct trademark infringement, (2) contributory trademark infringement, (3) false advertising, and (4) unlawful and unfair business practices. 

Sims promotes various beauty products on her beauty blog, Molly Sims: Beauty Everywhere, and on her Instagram account @mollybsims. Sims allegedly published a blog post on her site to promote  R+F’s product using the “Brow Boost” mark. She also provided a link to R+F’s website where the product was available for sale.

In a second blog post, Sims opens by thanking R+F for sponsoring her post and favorably reviews the product. At the end of the post, she includes a link to R+F’s website for those who want to “learn more about how to purchase Brow Defining Boost.” Petunia claims that Sims used the mark “Brow Boost” in this blog post, however, Sims denies this. The blog posts have since been removed from her website.  

 Petunia claims that in her sponsored blog post, Sims “promoted a product which competes with their product, sounds like their product, and is marketed through similar channels as those used by the plaintiff.”

Sims moved to dismiss Petunia’s claims against her and argued that:

  1. liability for trademark infringement should not cover third parties, like her, that author sponsored blogs about a product;  
  2. her blog post is not likely to confuse customers about the source of the product; and 
  3. she did not use the trademark in commerce.

The Court refused to dismiss all of the claims against Sims, and only dismissed the claim for contributory trademark infringement since she was not aware of the alleged infringement. However, the Court allowed the other claims to proceed and determined that Sims’ posts were paid advertisements, and thus, “crossed from protected consumer commentary to commercial use.”  

We will follow this case and see where the dust settles when it’s resolved. Although, we may never get to a court’s ruling on these specific issues if Sims and Petunia settle the matter without the Court’s intervention. Only time will tell.


Here are 2 tips for social media influencers and bloggers to mitigate some of their liability exposure on the issues raised above:​

  1. Contracts: social media influencers and bloggers should always only accept any paid advertising opportunities where iron-clad contracts are signed. The contracts should, at the minimum, require the company to take the full liability of any of their wrongdoing and represent and warrant that the company is not infringing on the intellectual property rights of others or violating any laws.
  2. Research: social media influencers and bloggers should always do their due diligence on the companies they are associating themselves with to ensure that they are aligned with the right companies.  
This case is a sobering reminder of how easy it is to get caught up in the wrong opportunity when we miss the most prudent step of any business transaction, which is to hire a business lawyer to help you finalize the advertising deals.

If you want to learn more about other legal topics, feel free to check out our Articles page on our site.


The Benkabbou Law Firm, PLLC, is a boutique law firm located in Tampa, Florida. Our firm focuses on business law, immigration law, business immigration law, and intellectual property law. At our firm, we treat our clients like family and treat their interests and dreams as our own.


At the Benkabbou Law Firm, PLLC, we value keeping our clients informed of all possible problems they may face. We provide proactive legal solutions to help our clients avoid the possibility of liability, which saves our clients money, time, and resources. In uncertain times like these, we are prioritizing the long-term interests of our clients and their livelihoods. We are also help you navigate reopening your business after COVID.

To receive updates just like this, please consider subscribing to our newsletter. We skip the legal jargon and send the need-to-know updates straight to your inbox. Join our newsletter here.

DISCLAIMER: Information communicated in, to, or through this blog post and your receipt or use thereof: (1) does not create an attorney-client relationship; (2) it is not intended as a solicitation; (3) is not intended to convey legal advice or constitute legal advice; (4) and it is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. You should not act upon any such information without first seeking qualified professional counsel on your specific matter.